Articles

Ohio Ruling Invalidates Intoxilyzer 8000 Results

Filed under: DUI by Contributor @ August 25, 2013

In Ohio, a lower court ruled that BAC results from the widely used Intoxilyzer 8000 breathalyzer are not admissible in court. Judge Teresa L. Liston rendered the decision in Municipal Court (Pennsylvania only has a Municipal Court in Philadelphia) on August 13. Liston was appointed by the Ohio Supreme Court for the specific purpose of […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

A New Pennsylvania State Police Breathalyzer Controversy

Filed under: DUI by Contributor @ August 15, 2013

For whatever reason, Pennsylvania State Police barracks seem to have an issue with maintaining reliable breath test machines that produce valid results. Earlier this year we wrote a blog about results from the Intoxilyzer 5000EN being deemed inadmissible in Dauphin County due to regulations regarding the simulator solution not being followed and other reasons. Now, […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

PA Superior Court: Police Must Honor Driver’s Request to be Tested by Specific Method

Filed under: DUI by Contributor @ July 17, 2013

Last week, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued its decision on Commonwealth v. Barker, in which it sought to answer the question: When a person suspected of DUI requests to have a specific or alternate form of chemical testing administered, must the arresting officer honor that request? If the officer fails to honor that request, […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

PA Superior Court Ruling: 6 Month Max On First & Second Offense DUI

Filed under: DUI by Contributor @ July 4, 2013

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently decided Commonwealth v. Musau, in which it sought to answer the question: Can a defendant receive a sentence of more than six months for a first or second DUI conviction when the defendant refused a blood or breath test, which constitutes a misdemeanor of the first degree? The court […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Sleepdriving a Legitimate Defense to DUI in Oregon

Filed under: DUI by Contributor @ June 16, 2013

Last week, Oregon’s Supreme Court ruled in State v. Newman that “sleepdriving” is a legitimate defense for DUII. In Oregon, DUII is the acronym for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants, which is comparable to PA’s DUI law. DUI is a strict liability crime, which means it does not require the offender to possess at […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment