Articles

PA Supreme Court May Create Bright Line Rule For Investigative Detentions

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ March 30, 2014

Having recently heard oral arguments, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. Lyles may create a bright line rule for determining when exactly an investigative detention begins. In Lyles, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress the crack cocaine and marijuana found on his person after an allegedly unconstitutional investigative detention. Lyles and another […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Are police using new unidentified surveillance techniques in Montgomery County and Bucks County?

Filed under: Criminal Law by Steven F. Fairlie @ March 25, 2014

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/23/cops-phone-tracking_n_5016862.html

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Superior Court: Defendant Does Not Have Duty to Object to Rule 600 Violation

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ March 24, 2014

On March 7, the Superior Court held in Commonwealth v. Colon, 2014 WL 895216, that a defendant does not have a duty to object to a Rule 600 violation at the earliest opportunity, and that delays caused by the defendant after the Rule 600 clock expires do not preclude the defendant from later moving to […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Third Circuit: ICE Detainers Are Mere Requests

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ March 19, 2014

On March 4, the Third Circuit in Galarza v. Szalczyk, 2014 WL 815127, held that ICE detainers pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 287.7 are mere requests that an arresting agency not release a suspected non-citizen until ICE can arrange a transfer of custody, as opposed to an order that the arresting agency not release the […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

PA Superior Court Decides Fifth Amendment Case

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ March 16, 2014

On March 5, the Pennsylvania Superior Court decided in Commonwealth v. Green, 2014 PA Super 42 (2014), that Defendant Len Allen Green’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated when, as a condition of his post-incarceration probation for theft, he was ordered to disclose the location of the items he stole. Green argued that the […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment