A three-member panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court has upended the required evidence for proving a prima facie case at a preliminary hearing, holding in Commonwealth v. Ricker, 2015 WL 43810955, that a prima facie case at this stage in a criminal proceeding can be established solely based on hearsay. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement […]
Articles
Article Categories
To Err is Canine? An Opportunity for a Challenge to Drug Sniffs in Pennsylvania
Recently, the United States 7th Circuit of Appeals, a federal appeals court based out of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana, released a decision (United States v. Bentley) that seriously throws into question the reliability of drug dog sniffs as a justification for a police search. In that seminal case, the panel pointed out that the dog […]
Expungement in Federal Courts?
A few days ago, United States District Judge John Gleeson of the Eastern District of New York ordered that a 13-year old federal conviction for fraud be expunged. The ability to have a previous state criminal conviction expunged is available by statute and common law in Pennsylvania (learn more about expungement here). However, it may […]
SUPERIOR COURT: SCOTUS “Trespass Doctrine” for 4th Amendment Applies to Computer Search
In Commonwealth v. Sodomsky, 2015 Pa. Super. 133, a three-judge panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that digital information stored on a desktop computer is subject to Fourth Amendment protections, regardless of the defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy. The defendant had dropped off his desktop computer to Circuit City’s technology department in order for a new […]
SCOTUS: Ohio v. Clark Majority Further Discerns Scope of Confrontation Clause
In Ohio v. Clark, a 6-member majority of the United States Supreme Court agreed that introduction of incriminating statements made to a school teacher by a three-year-old boy indicating that a specific person was responsible for abusing him was admissible and not a violation of the Confrontation Clause. Three other members concurred in the judgment, […]
