Articles

Defendant Violated PFA by Texting Protected Party About Property Settlement

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ April 18, 2016

On April 11th, 2016, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania decided the case of Commonwealth v. Taylor, holding in a 5-3 decision that a defendant’s communications with his ex-wife, who was protected by a PFA, regarding the settlement of a property were not for legitimate issues regarding their children, and consequently constituted indirect criminal contempt violations […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Rule 600 requires proof of due diligence

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ April 10, 2016

On March 30th, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania decided Commonwealth v. Thompson, holding that the Commonwealth cannot establish that it exercised “due diligence” in seeking a defendant’s presence at trial by simply presenting testimony that it was standard practice in the DA’s Office to issue writs to secure the presence of defendants. On December 4th, […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Parolee Should Have Been Advised He Had to Serve Back Time Before Commencing New Sentence

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ March 28, 2016

On March 15th, the Pennsylvania Superior Court decided the case of Commonwealth v. Kelley, holding that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to advise the defendant that he would be required to serve back time related to his parole before commencement of the new state sentence imposed for his more recent offenses. On June 12th, […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Montgomery County Judge Suppresses Video Taken by CI in Car

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ March 23, 2016

On Tuesday, Montgomery County Judge Steven T. O’Neill, in Commonwealth v. Enos , suppressed a video taken by a confidential informant during a controlled buy inside of an automobile. In Enos, a Pottstown detective worked with a CI to set up a controlled buy in which the CI was supplied with a hidden body camera. […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Questions Over DNA Evidence Used in New York Prosecutions

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ February 26, 2016

A lawsuit brought by three forensic scientists accused of cheating on a training exam for new software may uncover a much deeper, more troubling problem in New York’s Criminal Justice system. These scientists claim that they merely collaborated with colleagues on the exam, as they were encouraged to do throughout their training process, and that […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment