Articles

Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Analyst Need Not Testify for Confrontation Clause to be Satisfied

Filed under: DUI, News by Contributor @ November 6, 2013

On October 30, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Commonwealth v. Yohe, where it held that it is not a violation of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause for a forensic toxicology analyst who merely interpreted test results of a DUI blood sample, but did not actually conduct the testing, to testify about the result. The […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

2013 Montgomery County judicial election results

Filed under: News by Steven F. Fairlie @ November 5, 2013

It’s official – the Montgomery County website has Gail Weilheimer listed as the top vote getter and Steven Tolliver listed in second place, just slightly ahead of the two Republican candidates Maureen Coggins and Sharon Giamporcaro. Most people in the know had difficulty calling this race as it was not clear whether Democrats had the […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Third Circuit: GPS Tracker Requires Warrant

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ November 1, 2013

On October 22, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decided United States v. Katzin, a long-awaited Fourth Amendment ruling. The court answered a major question that was left open in United States v. Jones, decided two years prior: Does an officer need a warrant before attaching a “slap-on” GPS receiver to a car in order […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

DUI “Expert” Facing Perjury Charges

Filed under: Strange But True by Contributor @ October 30, 2013

A Georgia doctor is facing perjury charges for allegedly lying about his credentials as an expert witness in DUI cases in Dauphin, Lancaster, Lebanon, Centre and Clinton counties. The Lancaster County District Attorney’s Office is leading the prosecution and charged 68-year-old Dr. Joseph Citron with two felony counts of perjury, two counts of false swearing […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Jury Must Determine Whether Officer Read O’Connell Warning In DUI Refusal Cases

Filed under: DUI by Contributor @ October 29, 2013

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania held in Commonwealth v. Barr , just a few days ago, that a trial court must submit to the jury the issue of whether the defendant in a DUI refusal case was properly informed of Pennsylvania’s implied consent law and the penalties for a chemical test refusal. The court applied […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment