Articles

Child porn software results in criminal cases dismissed

Filed under: Sex Crimes, Uncategorized by Steven F. Fairlie @ April 4, 2019

https://www.propublica.org/article/prosecutors-dropping-child-porn-charges-after-software-tools-are-questioned

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Elizabeth Lippy’s Trial Advocacy Program wins First Place at National Criminal Justice Trial Competition in Chicago

Filed under: Fairlie & Lippy News, Uncategorized by Steven F. Fairlie @ March 19, 2019

Congratulations to Fairlie & Lippy Partner Elizabeth Lippy! She is Associate Director of American University Law School’s Trial Advocacy Program, which just won First Place at the National Criminal Justice Trial Competition in Chicago. The team also dominated in the individual awards, winning awards for the best opening, best closing, and best cross-examination. Elizabeth is […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

New PA Rule 126 will allow citation to non-precedential opinions

Filed under: News by Steven F. Fairlie @ March 4, 2019

For some unknown reason Pennsylvania’s courts have refused to allow litigants to cite to the majority of Superior Court and Commonwealth Court decisions – those that were designated as non-precedential.  This could be maddening if you found a case directly on point with the issue in your case.  You’re holding the answer in your hand.  […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Medical Marijuana will soon be available closer to home

Filed under: Drug Crimes, News by Contributor @ February 12, 2019

  Eligible for medical marijuana? Soon you can find it even closer to home. A medical marijuana dispensary was approved to open in Horsham at 255 Horsham Rd. through CB Health Services, LLC. The location will have six months to meet the state’s standards and get up and running before they may begin dispensing medical marijuana. Governor Wolf […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment

Restitution MUST Be Specified At Time Of Sentencing

Filed under: Criminal Law by Contributor @ January 30, 2019

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has established that restitution must be specified at the time of sentencing to be legal. The court vacated the original sentence in Commonwealth v. Ramos, holding the trial court has “no authority to impose a generalized, open-ended sentence of restitution, but leave the amount and method of payment for decision at a […]

Continue reading » Leave a comment